Sunday, September 8, 2024

Integrating the History of Mathematics in the Classroom - Discussion Post

Prior to reading this article, I had an uncertain belief that the history of mathematics could play a role in teaching math. I recall reading a history of Greek mathematics as an undergraduate – this book made me feel as though I was the one ‘discovering’ mathematics. I believe such experiences are more accessible in universities (relative to secondary schools) because this feeling of discovery goes hand-in-hand with the creative side of mathematics. To inspire mathematical creativity in high schools, I frequently see the inclusion of ‘math-games’. This inclusion ‘feels’ correct, however the mathematics often feels arbitrary and disconnected from the curriculum. I am curious if history can act as a bridge between curriculum and the more playful, creative side of mathematics.

While initially reading the article’s list of ‘Objections to the incorporation of the history of mathematics’, I noticed many of the same objections had been made in Skemp’s article explaining why teachers opt to teach instrumental rather than relational mathematics. In particular – Lack of time, difficulty with examination, lack of teach expertise, and overburdened syllabi making new incorporations difficult. I speculate that the incorporation of the history of mathematics will be essential in the transition from teaching instrumental mathematics to teaching relational mathematics.

I felt a connection with the assertion that the history of mathematics will allow students to see math as beautiful, creative, and dynamic, rather than a purely formal and rigid science. Particularly 7.4.6 (i) ‘Errors’ presents opportunities for students to see the natural and intuitive side of mathematics. I feel strongly that activities based around historical errors can help cultivate the feeling of discovery I previously mentioned.

I finished this reading feeling excited. I see concrete ways that incorporating history can enrich the learning experience, specifically in providing context, motivation, and creative inspiration for students. I have a stronger belief that we can use history cultivate a feeling of discovery and creativity in the classroom. Lastly, I am still uncertain as to how this type of information will ‘land’ for young mathematicians. I worry that those expecting purely instrumental understanding will be uninterested in (what may seem like) an arbitrary history.



1 comment:

  1. Great first post, Jacob! I like how you connected to the Skemp article from EDCP 342. It’s great that you feel excited about incorporating history to enrich your students’ math experience. I’m also glad to see that you’re thinking about student buy-in. I often find myself convincing students that math is not about purely instrumental understanding in my 10+ years of teaching. That’s a challenge that all of us math educators face. As you said, hopefully, the history of mathematics can be one way to let students see math as beautiful, creative, and dynamic!

    ReplyDelete